CertQuestUSA
Transportation70+AK/AL/AR +moreConstruction & Safety39+CAEnvironmental98+AL/AR/AZ +moreHealthcare & Clinical183+AL/AR/AZ +moreProfessional Licensing307+AL/AR/AZ +moreEducation & Teacher Certification17Aviation & FAA Certification9Finance & Securities Licensing19View all sectors ›
Insights / Enforcement Data
Enforcement Data

What an EPA RCRA Violation Actually Costs, By the Numbers

August 30, 2026 · 7 min read · CertQuestUSA
TL;DR
  • RCRA hazardous-waste violations are ranked here by real federal volume, not by which ones get talked about most.
  • Small and very-small quantity generators carry a real, disclosed share of violations under several of the most-cited parts -- generator size is not a free pass.
  • Average penalties vary a lot by which part of the standard gets cited, and the two don’t always move together.
  • Every number on this page is live from the same real EPA RCRAInfo enforcement data behind CertQuestUSA’s public Risk Index -- see the full ranked table and methodology at /risk-index.

Most compliance content repeats the same advice: know your generator status, keep your manifests straight, don’t let waste sit past its accumulation limit. All true, all generic. What it doesn’t tell you is which of those failure modes actually shows up in a real EPA enforcement action, how often, and against whom. So we pulled the real federal record -- RCRAInfo’s violation, facility, and enforcement files -- and counted it ourselves.

Real RCRA violations by CFR part
CFR PartReal violationsAt small/very-small generatorsAvg. penalty
40 CFR 262376,33661.6%$49,038
40 CFR 26477,34434.1%$93,771
State-specific59,18166.9%$50,057
40 CFR 26557,26845.7%$74,755
40 CFR 27940,64577.8%$57,779
40 CFR 27332,56861.6%$45,269
40 CFR 26828,64155.7%$73,527
40 CFR 26221,06877.7%$58,153
Live from US EPA RCRAInfo enforcement data · full ranked table + methodology at /risk-index

Generator size is not the shield people assume it is

“We’re too small to be inspected” is contradicted by the data: 61.6% of 40 CFR 262 violations were issued at small or very-small quantity generators — 376,336 real violations.

US EPA RCRAInfo enforcement data, 2023-01-01–present · See the data

A common assumption is that small and very-small quantity generators fly under the radar because the big penalties are reserved for large operations. The real exposure data above doesn’t support that -- small and very-small generators show up under several of the most-cited parts at a real, meaningful share, not a rounding error. If your facility generates hazardous waste at all, the standard applies to you regardless of how little you generate; it changes which specific requirements attach, not whether any do.

Related exam
EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Generator
Covers generator classification, accumulation time limits, manifest requirements, and the training obligation under 40 CFR 262 -- the single most-cited RCRA part in the real data above.
Practice this exam →

What this means if you manage the program

The practical takeaway isn’t "reduce your generator category" -- most facilities can’t choose how much waste their process makes. It’s to put real training and documentation behind the specific parts that actually get cited, starting with whichever CFR part above carries both real volume and a real penalty average worth avoiding, rather than treating the whole standard as equally urgent.

Where this data comes from

Every figure on this page is pulled live from the same real US EPA RCRAInfo enforcement data (violations, facilities, and enforcement actions, 2023-01-01 through 2026-12-31) that powers CertQuestUSA’s public Risk Index. Rows below 50 real recorded violations are excluded as too thin to rank. Full disclosed methodology, every CFR part (including the ones with no matching CQU exam yet), and the FMCSA roadside-inspection data: see /risk-index.

Frequently asked questions

Which CFR part gets cited most often?
See the live-ranked table above -- it pulls the real current numbers from the same EPA RCRAInfo data behind CertQuestUSA’s Risk Index, so this answer updates automatically rather than going stale like a hardcoded figure would.
Does generator size (LQG, SQG, VSQG) protect a facility from citation risk?
No. The real exposure data above shows small and very-small quantity generators carrying a genuine, meaningful share of violations under several of the most-cited parts -- generator classification changes which specific requirements apply, not whether any do.
Where does this data come from?
US EPA RCRAInfo enforcement records (violations, facilities, and enforcement actions), 2023-01-01 through 2026-12-31. Full disclosed methodology and every CFR part, including ones with no matching CQU exam yet, at /risk-index.

Get our updates first in Google

Tell Google to show CertQuestUSA more often when you search for CDL, OSHA, EPA and licensing-exam news. One click, and you can undo it whenever you like.

Related reading
EPA 608 Type I, II, III, or Universal: Which Certification You Actually Need
Real HVAC forum threads show the same confusion over and over: which section to study, in what order, and why some people fail three times despite studying hard. Here is what each section actually covers and how to approach it.
HAZMAT Endorsement TSA Background Check: What Actually Happens After You Apply
Real driver forums are full of the same question: why does one driver hear back in five days and another waits months. Here is what the TSA process actually involves, and how to check your own status instead of guessing.
← Back to Insights